Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical applications of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) in the identification of pathogens in patients with urinary tract infection (UTI), peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP), central venous catheter related blood infections (CRBIs), and lung infections in the nephrology department. Methods: Midstream urine samples from 112 patients with UTI, peritoneal fluid samples from 67 patients with PDAP, blood samples from 15 patients with CRBI, and sputum specimens from 53 patients with lung infection were collected. The HTS and ordinary culture methods were carried out in parallel to identify the pathogens in each sample. Pathogen detection positive rate and efficacy were compared between the two methods. Results: The pathogen positive detection rates of HTS in UTI, PDAP, CRBI, and lung infection were strikingly higher than those of the culture method (84.8% vs. 35.7, 71.6% vs. 23.9%, 75% vs. 46.7%, 84.9% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.05, respectively). HTS was superior to the culture method in the sensitivity of detecting bacteria, fungi, atypical pathogens, and mixed microorganisms in those infections. In patients who had empirically used antibiotics before the test being conducted, HTS still exhibited a considerably higher positive rate than the culture method (81.6% vs. 39.0%, 68.1% vs. 14.9%, 72.7% vs. 36.4%, 83.3% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: HTS is remarkably more efficient than the culture method in detecting pathogens in diverse infectious diseases in nephrology, and is particularly potential in identifying the pathogens that are unable to be identified by the common culture method, such as in cases of complex infection with specific pathogens or subclinical infection due to preemptive use of antibiotics.