Multimodal large language models in ultrasound diagnosis of breast masses: a multicenter comparative analysis based on GPT-4o, radiologists, and convolutional neural network (CNN)

多模态大型语言模型在乳腺肿块超声诊断中的应用:基于 GPT-4o、放射科医生和卷积神经网络 (CNN) 的多中心比较分析

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An advanced version of large language model (LLM), ChatGPT 4o (GPT-4o), has shown capacity in image-text pair interpretation, yet the performance in medical image analysis remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic capacity of GPT-4o in breast ultrasound (US) datasets. METHODS: US exams including breast images and original reports were respectively included from January 2021 to December 2023 in three hospitals throughout China. The diagnostic performance in distinguishing benign or malignant breast masses of GPT-4o was assessed through two approaches: image-strategy and image-combined-text-strategy. Fleiss kappa was calculated to determine intra-LLM consistency. Thereafter, diagnostic accuracy was evaluated and compared with the convolutional neural network (CNN) model and 95 human experts with various levels of expertise from 60 institutions in China. Responses from GPT-4o were rated by diagnostic confidence and radiologist's evaluation. RESULTS: The observations of 80 breast masses (37 malignant, 43 benign) from 80 patients [median age, 42.5 years; interquartile range (IQR), 37.0-53.0 years] were enrolled. GPT-4o with image-strategy exhibited a fair consistency [0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-0.43], whereas the agreement of image-combined-text-strategy was excellent (0.81, 95% CI: 0.67-0.91). Diagnostic accuracy improved when deploying the image-combined-text-strategy compared to only image [58% (46 of 80) vs. 70% (56 of 80), P=0.031], which resembled board-certified moderately experienced radiologists (70% [56 of 80] vs. 71% [57 of 80], P=0.450) and customized CNN [70% (56 of 80) vs. 74% (59 of 80), P=0.701]. Heterogeneous Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-related signs and ground truth labels affected GPT-4o significantly. Besides, answers from image-combined-text-strategy were associated with higher proportions of correctness and completeness, and lower errors. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of GPT-4o in interpreting real-world US images was limited, yet improved in image-combined-text-strategy. Deploying LLM warrants scrutiny from radiologists.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。