Associations between app usage and behaviour change in a m-health intervention to improve physical activity and sleep health in adults: secondary analyses from two randomised controlled trials

移动健康干预中应用程序使用与行为改变之间的关联,旨在改善成人的身体活动和睡眠健康:两项随机对照试验的二次分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To examine associations between user engagement and activity-sleep patterns in a 12-week m-health behavioural intervention targeting physical activity and sleep. METHODS: This secondary analysis used data pooled from two Randomised Control Trials (RCT, [Synergy and Refresh]) that aimed to improve physical activity and sleep (PAS) among physically inactive adults with poor sleep. Both RCTs include a PAS intervention group (n = 190 [Synergy n = 80; Refresh n = 110]) and a wait list Control (CON n = 135 [Synergy n = 80; Refresh n = 55]). The PAS groups received a pedometer and accessed a smartphone/tablet "app" with behaviour change strategies, and email/SMS support. Activity-sleep patterns were quantified using the activity-sleep behaviour index (ASI) based on self-report measures. Intervention usage was quantified as a composite score of the frequency, intensity and duration of app usage during intervention (range: 0-30). Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Relationships between usage and ASI were examined using generalised linear models. Differences in ASI between the control group and intervention usage groups (Low [0-10.0], Mid [10.1-20.0], High [20.1-30.0]) were examined using generalised linear mixed models adjusted for baseline values of the outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12617000376347; ACTRN12617000680369. RESULTS: During the 3-month intervention, the mean (± sd) usage score was 18.9 ± 9.5. At 3 months (regression coefficient [95%CI]: 0.45 [0.22, 0.68]) and 6 months (0.48 [0.22, 0.74]) there was a weak association between usage score and ASI in the intervention group. At 3 months, ASI scores in the Mid (Mean [95%CI] = 57.51 [53.99, 61.04]) and High (60.09 [57.52, 62.67]) usage groups were significantly higher (better) than the control group (51.91 [49.58, 54.24]), but not the Low usage group (47.49 [41.87, 53.12]). Only differences between the high usage and control group remained at 6 months. CONCLUSION: These findings suggests that while higher intervention usage is associated with improvements in behaviour, the weak magnitude of this association suggests that other factors are also likely to influence behaviour change in m-health interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000376347; ACTRN12617000680369.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。