Abstract
Wilbrand's knee of the optic chiasm refers to crossing fibers from one optic nerve that stray for a short distance into the opposite optic nerve before joining the optic tract. This loop of aberrant axons, although small, has generated much controversy. In a previous study, labeling of the optic pathway in normal monkeys with a radioactive tracer revealed no Wilbrand's knee. Monocular enucleation induced a typical knee to form. These findings suggested that Wilbrand's knee is absent normally, but appears after atrophy of one optic nerve. This conclusion has been challenged by images showing Wilbrand's knee in the normal human chiasm using anisotropic light scattering. It has also been resisted by some clinicians who believe that Wilbrand's knee is necessary to explain the anterior chiasmal syndrome. Early in his distinguished career, William F. Hoyt examined the fiber organization of the monkey optic nerve and chiasm. He found no evidence for Wilbrand's knee and rejected its importance for the topical diagnosis of chiasmal lesions. His conclusion is supported by new data showing that anisotropic light scattering is not a reliable method for tracing axons. Hence, that method has given a misleading impression that Wilbrand's knee exists in normal subjects. Although Wilbrand's knee has fascinated neuro-ophthalmologists for more than a century, it is an inconsequential structure that develops only after a longstanding monocular optic neuropathy.