Abstract
PURPOSE: End-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients are the primary candidates for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, most morphological refinements of TKA prosthesis are based on anatomical data from the knees of healthy individuals. This study aimed to determine whether differences exist in key bony morphological characteristics of the distal femur and proximal tibia between osteoarthritic knees and healthy knees. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional observational study with a case-control design. Patients who were aged ≥ 50 years, had no history of trauma, fracture, or surgery in the studied knee, and had no obvious knee flexion contracture were included in this study by CT scans. Patients who met the American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria for knee OA were included in the study group. Kellgren-Lawrence grade III or IV knees were studied (for bilateral cases, the more severely affected knee was chosen). Patients who presented with unilateral knee pain or trauma were included in the control group, with CT scans from the opposite (asymptomatic) knee used for analyzing. The studied knee had a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 0 or I and showed no abnormalities upon physical examination. Archived knee CT scans from 160 patients were divided into 2 groups: the study group (80 moderate-to-severe OA knees) and the control group (80 healthy knees). After 3-dimensional reconstruction and virtual cutting using a CT workstation, 13 morphological parameters of the distal femur and proximal tibia were compared between the 2 groups using independent-samples t-tests. RESULTS: No significant group differences in the femoral anteroposterior dimension (p = 0.797), height of the lateral femoral condyle (p = 0.268), posterior condylar angle (p = 0.240), tibial anteroposterior dimension (p = 0.536), or tibial lateral anteroposterior dimension (p = 0.702) were observed. However, the femoral mediolateral dimension (p = 0.002), distal femoral aspect ratio (femoral mediolateral dimension/femoral anteroposterior dimension) (p < 0.001), height of the femoral trochlear groove (p < 0.001), height of the medial femoral condyle (p < 0.001), tibial mediolateral dimension (p = 0.001), proximal tibial aspect ratio (tibial mediolateral dimension/tibial anteroposterior dimension) (p = 0.004), tibial medial anteroposterior dimension (p = 0.005), and tibial asymmetry ratio (tibial medial anteroposterior dimension/tibial lateral anteroposterior dimension) (p = 0.006) were all significantly greater in the study group. CONCLUSION: Knees with moderate-to-severe OA are significantly wider than healthy knees, and OA is a risk factor for increased tibial platform asymmetry. When refining the morphological parameters of TKA prostheses, the specific bony morphological characteristics of OA knees should be taken into account to reduce the potential risk of femoral or tibial component underhang and facilitate optimal balance between tibial component fit and rotational alignment.