Comparison of Mid-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Measured Resection Technique and Gap Balanced Technique After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Medial Stabilizing Technique for Severe Varus Knee: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

采用内侧稳定技术治疗严重膝内翻畸形全膝关节置换术后,测量切除技术与间隙平衡技术中期临床和影像学结果的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析

阅读:1

Abstract

Background: The purpose was to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the medial stabilizing technique (MST) for severe varus knee with either measured resection technique (MRT) or gap balance technique (GBT). Methods: Between February 2018 and August 2020, a total of 236 knees with an HKA angle greater than 15° were enrolled in this study. Propensity score matching (1:1) was done based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle. 67 knees were enrolled in MRT (group M) and GBT (group G), respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 76.2 and 72 months in Groups M and G. Clinical and radiologic outcomes, including hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, joint line distance, and femoral component rotation angle (FCRA), were compared between the groups. Results: Preoperative clinical and radiological measurements had shown no statistical significance between both groups. The postoperative radiologic measurements, including HKA angle, joint line distance, and FCRA, were not significantly different. Postoperative WOMAC index, KSKS, and KSFS were also not significantly different between both groups. Conclusions: In patients with severe varus deformity undergoing TKA with MST, clinical and radiographic outcomes-including limb alignment, joint line position, and femoral component rotation-were comparable between MRT and GBT on mid-term follow-up data.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。