Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine parent and family outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing Teen Online Problem-Solving with Family (TOPS-F), Teen Online Problem-Solving-Teen Only (TOPS-TO), or access to Internet resources alone (Internet resource comparison [IRC]). DESIGN: Three-arm RCT. SETTING: Four children's hospitals and 1 general medical center in Ohio and Colorado. PARTICIPANTS: Children and adolescents (N=152), 11-18 years old, hospitalized for complicated mild to severe traumatic brain injury in the previous 18 months. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention groups: TOPS-F, TOPS-TO, and IRC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Parental depression (CES-D), parental psychological distress (SCL-90-GSI), family functioning (FAD-GF), cohesiveness (PARQ), and conflict (IBQ) were assessed pre- and post-treatment. Treatment effects and the moderating effect of the number of parents in the home (single vs 2-parent families). RESULTS: Number of parents moderated treatment effects with effects ranging from trending to statistically significant for depression, family functioning, cohesion, and conflict. Among single parents, TOPS-TO reported better family functioning than TOPS-F and greater cohesion and less conflict than IRC. Among 2-parent families, TOPS-F reported less depression than IRC and less depression and greater cohesion than TOPS-TO. The effect of family composition was also noted within TOPS-TO and TOPS-F. In TOPS-F, 2-parent families reported less depression than single-parent families. In TOPS-TO single parents reported greater cohesion and better family functioning than 2-parent families. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the TOPS intervention improves family outcomes, with differential effects noted for single vs 2-parent households. The TOPS-TO format appeared more beneficial for single-parent households, while TOPS-F was more beneficial for 2-parent households, highlighting the importance of considering family composition when determining the best treatment modality.