Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: For the aggressive treatment of postoperative pain, nonpharmacological methods (NPMs) are gaining importance complementary to routine multimodal pain management. The primary aim of the study was to assess the incidence of use of NPMs in our hospital. Secondary objectives were to correlate the pain scores, patient satisfaction, and percentage of time the patient was in severe pain within 72 h postsurgery with the use of NPMs when in pain/not in pain. The effect of NPMs on the physical and emotional outcome of patients as per the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ) was also assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After obtaining approval from the institutional ethics committee (IEC), the trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI). Informed consent was obtained from adult patients on the third postoperative day of elective surgeries. Their responses to the APS-POQ and to a few additional questions about their beliefs on the use of NPM were recorded. RESULTS: Only one-fourth of the total study population were using NPMs for pain management in the hospital. After propensity matching for surgery and postoperative analgesia, two groups were made: one using NPM for pain relief (n = 49) and the other not using NPM (n = 98). There was no significant difference among the satisfaction score (P = 0.31), least pain score (P = 0.68), and worst pain score (P = 0.43) within 72 h postoperatively in either of the groups. Emotional and physical outcomes as per the APS-POQ were similar in both the groups. CONCLUSION: NPMs are rarely practiced and used during postoperative pain in our hospital. No difference in pain scores, patient satisfaction, and emotional and physical outcomes of the APS-POQ was seen in the group that indulged in NPMs.