Abstract
CONTEXT: Erroneous blood pressure measurement could lead to improper treatment and hence progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In routine clinical practice, there is poor adherence to the various steps to be followed during blood pressure measurement. Automated oscillometric BP measurement is difficult to perform in routine clinical practice due to several practical limitations. AIMS: To evaluate the quality of blood pressure measurement and to compare routine office blood pressure measurement with standardized attended manually activated oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with CKD attending the nephrology outpatient department (OPD) of a tertiary care referral center. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This cross-sectional study was conducted in patients aged more than 18 years with CKD stage 3-5ND, and previously diagnosed hypertension, in the nephrology OPD of a tertiary care referral center between July 2022 and September 2022. METHODS AND MATERIAL: The quality of blood pressure measurement was evaluated using a questionnaire. The study participants had their blood pressure checked by both methods-routine office blood pressure and standardized attended manually activated oscillometric blood pressure. RESULTS: Standardized attended manually activated oscillometric blood pressure measurement yielded a significantly higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to routine office blood pressure measurement (Mean SBP: 139.53 ± 29.1 vs 132.57 ± 23.59; P < 0.001). However, the diastolic blood pressure did not differ significantly between the two methods of measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized attended manually activated oscillometric BP measurement yields a higher systolic BP compared to routine office BP measurement. Further studies are required to compare the standardized attended oscillometric BP measurement used in this study with unattended automated oscillometric BP measurement and ambulatory BP measurement.