Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Significance of Positive Blood Cultures in the Emergency Department: A Single-Center Study

急诊科血培养阳性临床意义的回顾性分析:一项单中心研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been major advances in blood culture technology in the last decade, with both faster and more sensitive pathogen detection as well as more precise species identification. We have reassessed the results of positive blood cultures in this new clinical microbiology era with a focus on contaminant identification. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted including all patients with a blood culture collected in 2 UMass Memorial Health emergency departments from September 2019 through April 2020. Contaminants were identified based on standard clinical microbiology laboratory criteria and independent retrospective review by 3 infectious disease (ID) physicians and an ID fellow. RESULTS: Of 5673 blood samples obtained, 5661 were analyzed after 12 were deemed inconclusive by the ID physician review. Blood culture contaminants accounted for 22.5% of the positive blood cultures. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most frequent contaminant (33.4%), while Escherichia coli was the most frequent pathogen (21%) causing true bacteremia. Coagulase-negative staphylococci remain the most frequent cause of blood culture contamination with S epidermidis being the most common. The Staphylococcus species S auricularis, S caprae, S lentus, S pseudointermedius, S saccharolyticus, and S warneri were all determined to be contaminants in 100% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The improvements in clinical laboratory technology enable better discrimination of the relative pathogenicity of differing coagulase-negative staphylococci species.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。