Ultrasound-guided percutaneous electrolysis versus dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain a double-blind randomized clinical trial

超声引导下经皮电解疗法与干针疗法治疗慢性腰痛患者的双盲随机临床试验

阅读:3

Abstract

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was analysed the effects of percutaneous electrolysis versus electrical dry needling on pain, functionality, fear of movement and quality of live and sleep in patients with chronic low back pain. A total of 64 patients with chronic low back pain (age 46.45 ± 10.5) were randomly assigned to percutaneous electrolysis on the lumbar nerve root of L3 to L5, or electrical dry needling on the trigger points. Both groups received once a week for 6 weeks. The main outcome measures were pressure pain threshold and disability were the main, all outcomes were assessed at baseline, at 3, 6 and 10 weeks. The ANOVA test showed statistically significant differences for disability: F = 5.70, P = 0.005; pain: F = 7.42, P = 0.001; fear of movement: F = 4.24, P = 0.019; finger-to-floor distance test: F = 19.30, P < 0.001; and for daytime sleep: F = 3.14, P = 0.050; bodily pain: F = 5.03, P = 0.010; and total anxiety: F = 3.71, P = 0.030. In conclusion, the ultrasound-guided percutaneous electrolysis on the lumbar nerve root of L3 to L5 was able to increase the pressure pain threshold, and decrease the pain intensity, disability, fear of movement, and finger-to-floor distance in individuals with chronic low back pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-45876-5.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。