Effectiveness of tuina and physiotherapy to manage pain for patients with chronic low back pain: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial

推拿和物理疗法治疗慢性腰痛患者的疗效:一项实用性随机临床试验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic non-specific low back pain lacks a defined pathoanatomical cause, leading to diverse treatment methods including physiotherapy and complementary alternative medicine techniques such as Tuina. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Tuina for managing chronic non-specific low back pain by comparing it to physiotherapy and a combination of physiotherapy and Tuina. METHODS: In this randomized, parallel-controlled, single-blind trial, 204 participants aged 21 to 75 with chronic non-specific low back pain were randomly assigned to physiotherapy, Tuina, or combined therapy. Pain intensity and quality of life were measured with the visual analog scale, 36-Item Short Form Survey and the Oswestry Disability Index, alongside trunk range of motion. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, two months, and five months. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance for within- and between-group comparisons, and post-hoc tests were applied to between-group comparisons. RESULTS: After two months, all groups had significant improvement in pain scores. Tuina was only significantly better than the combination treatment for reducing pain (p = 0.021; mean difference = - 1.04 [95% CI - 1.85 to - 0.23], Cohen's d = - 0.41). However, no significant difference was observed between Tuina and combined treatment against physiotherapy. Pain scores were not significantly different at five months in all groups. The physiotherapy (p = 0.019; mean difference = - 5.28 [95% CI - 9.44 to - 1.11], d = - 0.44) and combined (p = 0.028; mean difference = 5.59 [95% CI 1.17 to 10.01], d = 0.42) groups showed a significant reduction in Oswestry Disability Index scores compared to Tuina at five months. The combined group had significantly greater 36-Item Short-Form Survey than Tuina (p = 0.012; mean difference = - 71.15 [95% CI - 118.23 to - 24.06], d = - 0.47), but not significantly greater than physiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: All treatment groups demonstrated improved outcomes post-intervention and at five months. Between-group differences in improvement were significant only for Oswestry Disability Index and 36-Item Short-Form Survey scores at five months. Pain scores showed no significant superiority of physiotherapy over Tuina and combined therapy (d < 0.2), indicating potential use of Tuina in chronic non-specific low back pain management. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ChiMCTR2000004087.  URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=62614 .  Date of Registration: 27 November 2020.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。