The Effectiveness of Respiratory Muscle Training on the Duration and Severity of Respiratory Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

呼吸肌训练对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者呼吸道症状持续时间和严重程度的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:3

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of respiratory muscle training (RMT) on respiratory symptom severity and symptom duration in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to appraise the certainty of the evidence. METHODS: We searched seven databases and included parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RMT plus guideline-based care versus control. Meta-analyses were conducted in RevMan using fixed- or random-effects models as appropriate. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Because multiple outcomes were analysed, we controlled the false discovery rate using the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure across prespecified meta-analysed outcomes and report both unadjusted and BH-adjusted p values. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (n = 1171) were included. No trial reported symptom duration in a way that matched our prespecified definition. Compared with control, RMT reduced dyspnoea (mMRC; unadjusted p = 0.003; BH-adjusted p = 0.007; moderate certainty) and improved health-related quality of life (SGRQ; unadjusted p < 0.00001; BH-adjusted p = 3.5e - 05; moderate certainty). Lung function effects were mixed: FVC improved (MD = 0.37 L, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.40; unadjusted p < 0.00001; BH-adjusted p = 3.5e - 05; low certainty) and FEV1/FVC improved (MD = 1.84%, 95% CI 0.29 to 3.39; unadjusted p = 0.02; BH-adjusted p = 0.035; low certainty), while FEV1 did not differ significantly (MD = 0.18 L, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.40; unadjusted p = 0.11; BH-adjusted p = 0.11; low certainty). Evidence for overall symptom burden and exercise capacity was uncertain: CAT (unadjusted p = 0.06; BH-adjusted p = 0.07; very low certainty) and 6MWD (unadjusted p = 0.05; BH-adjusted p = 0.07; very low certainty). CONCLUSION: In adults with COPD, adding RMT to guideline-based care probably reduces dyspnoea and improves health-related quality of life (moderate certainty). Evidence for benefits on overall symptom burden, lung function, and exercise capacity is low to very low, and the effect on symptom duration remains unknown due to the lack of reporting.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。