From policy to practice: why the WHO's Africa rehabilitation strategy 2025-2035 risks failure without educational reform

从政策到实践:为何若缺乏教育改革,世卫组织2025-2035年非洲复兴战略将面临失败风险

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In July 2025, the WHO African Regional Committee adopted an ambitious strategy to address the 63% rehabilitation access gap through a comprehensive five-pillar framework. However, systematic educational exclusion of rehabilitation in African medical curricula may undermine implementation across all strategic pillars. METHODS: Analysis of the WHO AFRO 2025-2035 strategy implementation framework, complemented by systematic curriculum assessment across Central African medical schools and ethnographic observations from Cameroon documenting current access barriers and workforce knowledge gaps. RESULTS: Medical schools across Central Africa systematically exclude rehabilitation from curricula, with the University of Dschang representing a rare exception (4 h annually). This educational vacuum generates cascading failures: policymakers cannot prioritize services they don't understand (Pillar 1: Governance), physicians cannot refer to specialists they've never encountered (Pillar 2: Workforce), evidence-based interventions are dismissed in favor of pharmaceuticals (Pillar 3: Service Delivery), rehabilitation needs remain invisible in data systems (Pillar 4: Information), and financing mechanisms struggle to support undervalued services (Pillar 5: Resources). Field evidence reveals patients traveling over 1,000 km for rare rehabilitation expertise, reflecting profound system-level educational failures. CONCLUSION: Without urgent educational reform, the WHO strategy risks replicating historical implementation failures despite comprehensive policy architecture. Educational exclusion represents not a peripheral concern but a foundational threat to strategy success. Medical curriculum integration offers a cost-effective, scalable intervention that amplifies all five strategic pillars. African health leaders must prioritize educational reform as essential infrastructure, not optional enhancement.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。