Dry needling for mechanical neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

干针疗法治疗机械性颈痛:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dry needling (DN) has emerged as a potential treatment for mechanical neck pain, but the evidence remains inconclusive. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of DN in improving pain and functionality in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched from December 2013 to January 2024. Studies involving adult participants with chronic mechanical neck pain treated with DN were included in the study. The primary outcomes were pain pressure threshold (PPT), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and cervical range of motion. Statistical analysis used a random-effect model. RESULTS: Nine RCTs with a total of 540 participants were included in the study. DN significantly improved the PPT with an MD of 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.65; P < 0.001). NDI also showed a significant improvement, with an MD of -0.68 (95% CI, -1.32--0.05; P = 0.04). In terms of cervical range of motion, DN improved flexion (MD 4.07, 95% CI, 0.39-7.75; P = 0.03) and right rotation (MD 8.20, 95% CI, 3.05-13.35; P = 0.002), but no significant differences were observed in extension, left rotation, or lateral flexions (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: DN appears effective in short-term pain relief and functional outcomes for patients with mechanical neck pain but shows limited impact on the cervical range of motion.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。