Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This narrative review aimed to examine the common existing factors that can influence medical students' attitudes and acceptability of peer physical examination, the presence of any variations of such attitudes over the time period included in the review, and provide measures to improve the acceptability of this practice, and directs attention to future research. METHODS: This study utilized a systematic and comprehensive search technique to find relevant publications based on pre-defined eligibility criteria. Electronic searches were conducted using two search engines, PubMed and Google Scholar, with an additional manual search on Medical Teacher Journal. In addition, a critical evaluation tool was applied to critically assess each article. RESULTS: Evidence indicated that gender is consistently reported as the most influential factor affecting the acceptance of peer physical examination among healthcare professionals, independent of the presence of other factors. Essentially, conservative cultures, religion, and particular ethnicities are still exerting their impacts on the participant's willingness to participate in this activity. In addition, the current study found no significant variations in accepting this practice by the students over the reviewed period of time. CONCLUSION: According to the evidence provided by this review, a number of possible recommendations should be considered to boost and optimize the applicability of PPE. These include starting with non-sensitive areas, using single-gender pairing, and considering cultural and religious beliefs. Finally, there is a pressing need for future research, including multi-centric studies with larger and more diverse samples.