Comparison of Kaltenborn mobilization technique and muscle energy technique on range of motion, pain and function in subjects with chronic shoulder adhesive capsulitis

比较卡尔滕伯恩手法和肌肉能量技术对慢性肩关节粘连性关节囊炎患者活动范围、疼痛和功能的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shoulder adhesive capsulitis (AC) is a common musculoskeletal condition causing pain, loss of range of motion (ROM) in the shoulder, and a decrease in its functionality, yet poorly defined and understood since its identification. Kaltenborn mobilization technique (KMT) and muscle energy technique (MET) are commonly used physiotherapeutic techniques for their treatment. To the best of our understanding, there was no study found to compare the effectiveness of one technique over another. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of KMT and MET on the ROM, pain and function in subjects with chronic shoulder AC. METHODS: In this single-centred, single-blinded quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design 35 subjects were randomized into two groups: Group A (n = 18) received KMT and Group B (n = 17) received MET along with the moist hot pack (MHP), supervised exercises and home exercises common to both the groups. A total of 32 subjects completed the study with three dropouts. Subjects were evaluated before and after 10 treatment sessions for the outcomes, shoulder external rotation passive range of motion (ER-PROM) and abduction passive range of motion (ABD-PROM) using the universal goniometer, intensity of pain using the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and functional disability using the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI). RESULTS: Analysis of 32 subjects showed that both groups were homogenous at baseline. The within-group analysis showed significant improvement (p < 0.05) in both groups related to all the outcomes. But when we compared the groups, Group B showed significant (p < 0.05) improvement in NPRS and SPADI in comparison to Group A. However, there was non-significant (p > 0.05) difference found in ER-PROM and ABD-PROM. CONCLUSION: Both KMT and MET are effective in improving ROM, pain and function but MET showed a significant reduction of pain and improvement in function in subjects with chronic shoulder AC, thus supporting its use as a physiotherapeutic treatment technique.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。