Abstract
Background Rapid and accurate hemoglobin (Hb) measurement is crucial in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients for timely management of anemia and transfusion decisions. Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring (SpHb) offers continuous assessment, while venous blood gas hemoglobin (VBGHb) provides point-of-care measurement. This study aimed to evaluate the absolute and trend accuracy of SpHb and VBGHb compared to standard laboratory hemoglobin (LabHb) in ICU patients. Methods Twenty patients in the ICU were enrolled. Hemoglobin was measured using SpHb, VBGHb, and LabHb. Absolute accuracy was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, and correlation between methods was evaluated with Pearson correlation. Trend accuracy was assessed with modified Bland-Altman plots. Results A total of 79 samples were collected. SpHb demonstrated a mean bias of -0.0557 gm/dL (95% limits of agreement: -0.5614 to 0.4499) relative to LabHb, while VBGHb showed a larger bias of -0.4734 gm/dL (-2.8312 to 1.8844). SpHb had a strong correlation with LabHb (r = 0.978, p < 0.001), whereas VBGHb showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.506, p < 0.001). Trend analysis revealed a mean trend bias of -0.0102 gm/dL for SpHb (limits -0.6317 to 0.6113), compared with 0.0136 gm/dL for VBGHb (-3.5733 to 3.5461). Conclusions We concluded that SpHb demonstrated acceptable absolute and trend accuracy, as well as excellent correlation with LabHb, providing an easy, feasible, and accurate solution for Hb measurement in the ICU. Future studies should assess its impact on transfusion practices and patient outcomes.