Abstract
BACKGROUND: An epidural steroid injection (ESI) is used to treat a number of morbid central nervous system pathologies and is considered a reasonably safe procedure. This study aimed to determine the relative infection risk after spinal surgery by comparing outcomes in spinal surgery patients who received an ESI shortly prior to the surgery against those who did not receive an ESI shortly prior to the surgery. METHODS: The present study is a retrospective cohort study using a multi-institutional healthcare database, TriNetX, to collect data on patients who received spinal surgery with and without having had ESIs six months before surgery. Two cohorts were generated: Cohort 1 included patients who had received an ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery, and cohort 2 included patients who did not have an ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery. The patients in cohort 2 had propensity scores matched 1:1 to those in cohort 1 using common baseline demographics, comorbidities and spinal procedure indications. The spinal procedures and surgeries considered for the analysis included open procedures for any purpose, including exploration, decompression, resection, revision or biopsy. Multiple outcomes were compared across these two cohorts in the three months following the spinal procedure/surgery, including the occurrence of death, surgical site infection, epidural and/or spinal abscess, and dural tear. RESULTS: An ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery was associated with a significant decrease in the likelihood epidural/spinal abscess in the three months after surgery. There was no change in mortality, wound infection or identification of dural tear in the three months after spinal surgery for those who received an ESI six months before spinal surgery. CONCLUSION: This data suggests that epidural steroid injections' anti-inflammatory effects provide benefits before surgery beyond symptomatic relief. Given that the degeneration of spinal pathologies is typically advanced rather than corrected by the body's inflammatory response, it is likely that preventing hyperactivation of the body's immune system in the months preceding surgical intervention, a traumatic insult, is protective compared to no intervention and, importantly, without major adverse effects.