Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical strategies in older adult patients with acute type A aortic dissection (aTAAD) are crucial. We investigated the safety and efficiency of open limited surgery for septuagenarian and octogenarian patients with aTAAD. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2019, 1,092 patients diagnosed with aTAAD underwent open surgery in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups based on age: <70 years (n=956) and ≥70 years (n=136). Preoperative baseline characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. To investigate the safety and efficiency of the surgical approach for those aged ≥70 years, we separated these patients into two groups: (I) those who underwent root-sparing surgery and less-invasive arch surgery (Limited group; n=86); and (II) all others (Extensive group; n=50). RESULTS: Mortality was significantly higher in those aged ≥70 years than in those <70 years (20.6% vs. 13.2%; P=0.000), with age being a strong risk factor for postoperative mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.619; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.015-2.582; P=0.043]. Patients aged ≥70 years tended to receive less invasive surgery, and the rates of root replacement and arch replacement were lower. Patients in the limited surgery group had a higher rate of pericardial tamponade, and the durations of surgery, hypothermic circulation arrest, cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic clamp were all significantly shorter than in the extensive group. Mortality and postoperative complications were also lower in the limited surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: Although older age was a risk factor for open surgery for aTAAD, limited surgical techniques could lower the mortality and morbidity regardless of the need for extensive surgery.