Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim is to assess and contrast the effectiveness and safety of employing robotic surgery versus traditional open surgery in managing cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: Computer searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database to identify case-control studies comparing robotic surgery with traditional open surgery in the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma from inception until July 2023. References from retrieved articles were reviewed to broaden the search. This review was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024527511) and reported in line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) Guidelines. The primary outcome measures included operation time, intraoperative blood transfusion rate, R0 resection rate, lymph node metastasis rate, incidence of postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software, calculating combined odds ratios (OR), mean differences (MD), and 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 4 studies encompassing 267 patients diagnosed with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (177 males and 90 females, mean age of (58.8±5.7) years) were included in this analysis. Among these, 165 patients underwent open surgery, while 102 patients underwent robotic surgery. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated comparable outcomes between the two groups. Specifically, the operation time between the robotic surgery and open surgery cohorts did not significantly differ (MD=-103.96, 95% CI: -216.90 to 8.98, P = 0.070 ). Additionally, the intraoperative blood transfusion rate (OR=1.32, 95% CI: 0.43-4.07, P =0.630), R0 resection rate (OR=1.41, 95% CI: 0.71-2.81, P=0.330 ), and lymph node metastasis rate (OR=1.62, 95% CI: 0.46-5.63, P=0.450 ) showed no significant differences between the groups. Similarly, there were no statistically significant disparities observed in the incidence of postoperative complications (OR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.28-1.31, P=0.200 ) and postoperative hospital stay (MD=2.17, 95% CI: -11.56 to 15.90, P=0.760 ). CONCLUSION: In the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, robotic surgery demonstrates comparable safety and feasibility to traditional open surgery. However, due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, these conclusions warrant validation through additional high-quality investigations.