Abstract
Functional trait-based approaches have enriched our understanding of key ecological processes such as species assembly and biodiversity loss. This focus on traits, rather than taxonomy, promotes comparability across spatial and organisational scales, further enabling the application of trait-based methodologies to systems where species identity is difficult to recognise. Among other issues, however, the lack of standardisation is preventing trait-based approaches from unlocking their true potential. Here, 407 published articles (peer-reviewed and grey literature) are reviewed alongside the Biological Traits Information Catalogue (BIOTIC) to document inconsistencies in the understanding and use of trait terminology in the context of marine benthic ecosystems. Firstly, discrepancies in the operationalisation of key concepts are noted, each associated with six to ten separate definitions. Secondly, three distinct trait classification frameworks are identified, of which one presents considerable internal variation; within-framework trait classification also emerges as inconsistent. Lastly, a total of 290 synonyms and associated modalities are noted with respect to 18 traits commonly implemented in benthic research, amounting to an average of 16 synonyms per trait. Researchers should be aware of such inconsistencies; to overcome them, we propose a set of guidelines aimed at standardising the reporting and classification of traits in benthic research for policy and management applications. As other standards may exist, we further present a 'translation' table intended for use by trait ecologists when reviewing existing literature that adheres to different trait classification frameworks than the ones we recommend. Standardising the reporting and storage of trait data will help align our understanding of the function of benthic assemblages, their role in delivering ecosystem services, and the impact of human activities on ecosystem function.