A Multidimensional Analysis of the Determinants of Medication Counseling Behaviors: A Cross-Sectional Study of Community Pharmacists in Jazan, Saudi Arabia

药物咨询行为决定因素的多维度分析:沙特阿拉伯吉赞社区药剂师的横断面研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists serve as the final safety checkpoint in the medication-use system; however, practice patterns often prioritize technical logistics over clinical safety. While the deficit in risk counseling is well-documented, the mechanisms driving this "selective negligence" remain underexplored. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the structural and professional determinants of routine versus risk-based counseling behaviors among community pharmacists in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted (July-September 2024) among licensed community pharmacists (N=230) across the Jazan region. Data were collected using a multi-domain instrument assessing self-reported counseling frequencies. Multivariable beta regression models were employed to estimate the average marginal effects (AME) of predictors, adjusting for workforce structure, workload, and pharmacist demographics. RESULTS: Analysis revealed a functional dichotomy: "core use" instructions were universal (median: 5 (IQR: 5-5)), whereas "risk communication" was significantly lower (median: 4 (IQR: 2-5)). Regression models identified divergent determinants. "core use" was driven by professional habits; "checking patient understanding" was the strongest positive predictor (AME: +10.3%, p<0.001), while lower self-rated quality of counseling significantly reduced performance (AME: -10.7%, p<0.001). Conversely, "risk communication" was structurally driven; the presence of a pharmacy assistant was the primary positive predictor (AME: +9.9%, p=0.010). Notably, holding a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) degree was associated with lower "core use" scores (AME: -4.7%, p=0.004) compared to BSc (Bachelor of Science in Pharmacy) degrees and showed no significant advantage for risk counseling. CONCLUSION: Routine counseling is sustained by professional habit, but safety-critical risk communication is constrained by operational bandwidth. Closing the safety gap requires structural interventions, specifically the integration of support staff, rather than reliance on educational credentials alone.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。