Comparison of Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction Between Two Trifocal Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective, Paired-Eye Comparative Study

两种三焦点人工晶状体视觉性能和患者满意度的比较:一项前瞻性双眼对照研究

阅读:3

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the visual performance, patient-reported outcomes, and spectacle independence of two advanced trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) platforms, Clareon PanOptix and TECNIS Odyssey, in a paired-eye design. The primary hypothesis was that differences in optical design would yield distinct strengths in distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS), and patient satisfaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, single-center, single-surgeon trial at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, 19 patients (38 eyes; mean age 66.37 ± 10.61 years) undergoing bilateral cataract surgery were stratified by ocular dominance and randomized for dominant-eye IOL allocation. Each patient received a PanOptix (toric or non-toric) in one eye and an Odyssey (toric or non-toric) in the fellow eye, implanted one week apart. Postoperative assessments (≥1 month) included monocular distance-corrected VA at distance (CDVA, 4 m), intermediate (DCIVA, 60 cm), and near (DCNVA, 40 cm), uncorrected VAs, residual refraction, CS, and patient-reported visual quality and spectacle independence. RESULTS: Compared with PanOptix, Odyssey achieved significantly better CDVA (EMD=0.03 logMAR, 95% CI [0.01, 0.06], P=0.009) and UCDVA (EMD=0.06 logMAR, 95% CI [0.01, 0.12], P=0.03), while PanOptix demonstrated superior DCIVA (EMD=-0.05 logMAR, 95% CI [-0.09, -0.01], P=0.03). DCNVA, UCIVA, and UCNVA did not differ significantly (P≥0.07). CS was higher in Odyssey eyes (EMD=-5.47, 95% CI [-10.50, -0.42], P=0.03). Residual spherical equivalent was similar between groups (-0.10 D vs -0.09 D, P=0.91). Rates of starburst, halo, and glare were not significantly different (P≥0.34). Spectacle independence was achieved by 17 of 19 patients (89.47%) in both groups. CONCLUSION: In a paired-eye comparison, PanOptix provided superior intermediate VA, while Odyssey delivered better distance VA and CS. Both lenses yielded high spectacle independence and comparable rates of photic phenomena, supporting their viability as presbyopia-correcting options in cataract surgery.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。