Efficacy and Safety of Topical Insulin Eye Drops for Corneal Epithelial Defects: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Assessment

局部应用胰岛素滴眼液治疗角膜上皮缺损的疗效和安全性:系统评价、荟萃分析及推荐意见分级评估、制定和评价

阅读:3

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to review and meta-analyze the efficacy and safety of topical insulin eye drops (TIED) in treating corneal epithelial defects (CED). METHODS: We registered the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD420251051879). A systematic literature search on PubMed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar until May 2025 was done to identify controlled comparative studies. Outcomes of interest include time to complete re-epithelialization, re-epithelialization rate, treatment failure, recurrence, and adverse events. We performed meta-analysis using a random-effects model and assessed the certainty of evidence for each result using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 238 patients were included in the analysis. TIED significantly shortened re-epithelialization time (mean difference [MD] -1.20 days [-1.71--0.69], p<0.0001) and accelerated the healing rate (MD +0.26 mm(2)/h [0.10-0.42], p=0.002). In addition, TIED significantly reduced the risk of treatment failure (risk ratio [RR] 0.30 [0.16-0.57], p=0.003) and recurrence (RR 0.25 [0.11-0.56], p=0.0007) compared to conventional treatments, with no adverse events reported. GRADE assessments indicated very low to low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSION: TIED may speed corneal healing, cut failures and recurrences, and is well-tolerated and inexpensive. Robust randomized controlled trials are still needed to nail down the optimal dosing, long-term safety, and its role in CED management.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。