Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this work was to conduct a comprehensive literature review of the challenges encountered in ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations in patients with keratoconus undergoing cataract surgery and to evaluate the performance of various biometric techniques and IOL power calculation formulas in this population. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed for studies published until October 2025. Keywords included "keratoconus", "biometry", "IOL power calculation", "cataract surgery", "keratometry", and related terms. Studies evaluating the repeatability of biometric measurement, the accuracy of IOL formulas, and surgical outcomes in keratoconus patients were included. Study quality was assessed using standardized criteria, including study design, measurement standardization, and statistical appropriateness. Results: Twenty studies comprising 1596 eyes with keratoconus were analyzed. Biometric challenges include reduced keratometry repeatability (especially with K > 55 D), altered anterior-to-posterior corneal curvature ratios, anterior chamber depth, unreliable corneal power measurements, and tear film instability affecting measurement consistency. Keratoconus-specific formulas (Barrett's True-K for keratoconus and Kane's formula for keratoconus) demonstrated superior accuracy compared to standard formulas. The Barrett True-K formula with predicted posterior corneal astigmatism showed median absolute errors of 0.10-0.35 D across all severity stages, with 39-72% of eyes within ±0.50 D of target refraction. Traditional formulas (excluding SRK/T) produced hyperopic prediction errors that increased with disease severity. Swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry with total keratometry measurements improved prediction accuracy, particularly in severe keratoconus. Conclusions: IOL power calculation in keratoconus remains challenging due to multiple biometric measurement errors. Keratoconus-specific formulas significantly improve refractive outcomes compared to standard formulas. The use of total keratometry and swept-source OCT biometry, as well as the incorporation of posterior corneal power measurements, enhances accuracy. A multimodal approach combining advanced biometry devices with keratoconus-specific formulas is recommended for optimal outcomes.