2079. The Relation Between Panel Reactive Antibody Assay and Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Seropositive Solid Organ Transplantation Recipients

2079. 血清阳性实体器官移植受者中抗体反应性检测与巨细胞病毒再激活的关系

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can lead to severe morbidities and mortalities including pneumonia in particular as well as graft dysfunction through indirect immunomodulation in solid-organ transplantation recipients. High degree of HLA mismatch is a well-known risk factor of post-transplant (Tx) CMV reactivation. Recent laboratory advances for evaluating HLA mismatch can measure existence of donor-specific antibodies for single HLA allele; however, there was little evidence whether single panel reactive Ab (PRA) assay could predict CMV reactivation in SOT recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed pre-Tx HLA mismatch tests in total 300 of SOT recipients. All of them were CMV seropositive in donor and recipients and received regular blood CMV VL monitoring during ≥6 months after SOT. Lung (N = 83) and heart (N = 76) recipients received universal prophylaxis for 3 months, and kidney (N = 63) and liver (N = 78) received pre-emptive CMV therapy. The single PRA test for HLA class I/II was performed by bead-based immunoassay. The percentage of PRA was calculated by following formula: (the number of positive bead reaction/the number of beads in the assay) × 100. We categorized HLA-Ab specificity into two groups according to median fluorescent intensity (MFI) of bead; (1) strong with ≥10,000 of MFI, (2) not strong with <10,000. The calculated PRA was obtained from the frequency of HLA alleles in normal Korean population according to formula from U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. RESULTS: The reactivator with ever ≥500 IU/mL of CMV had significantly higher positive percentage of HLA Class I screening test compared than nonreactivator (33.8% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.004) but not class II (P = 0.085). The PRA and cPRA values only for HLA class I were significantly lower in nonreactivator (PRA, 0 [0–0] % vs. 0 [0–15] %, P = 0.005; cPRA, 0.5 [0–15.5] % vs. 4.5 [0–41.5] %, P = 0.030), but not class II (PRA, P = 0.393, cPRA, P = 0.446). The percentage of strong MFI group for class I in nonreactivator was significantly lower than those in reactivator (7.1% vs. 28.8%, P = 0.028), but not class II (11.6% vs. 15.8%, P = 0.512). The maximal levels of CMV VL did not have any significant correlation to MFI values of Class I nor II. CONCLUSION: Seropositive SOT recipients with strong PRA or cPRA values for HLA Class I in pre-Tx single PRA test had higher risk of CMV replication. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。