Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Insertion and deletion (indel) analysis of CRISPR-Cas guide RNAs (gRNAs) is crucial in gene editing to assess gRNA efficiency and indel frequency. This study evaluates the utility of CRISPResso2 with Oxford Nanopore sequencing data (nCRISPResso2) for gRNA indel screening, compared to two common Sanger sequencing-based methods, TIDE and ICE. To achieve this, sheep and horse fibroblasts were transfected with Cas9 and a gRNA targeting the myostatin (MSTN) gene. DNA was subsequently extracted, and PCR products exceeding 600 bp were sequenced using both Sanger and Nanopore sequencing. Indel profiling was then conducted using TIDE, ICE, and nCRISPResso2. RESULTS: Comparison revealed close correspondence in indel formation among methods. For the sheep MSTN gRNA, indel percentages were 52%, 58%, and 64% for TIDE, ICE, and nCRISPResso2, respectively. Horse MSTN gRNA showed 81%, 87%, and 86% edited amplicons for TIDE, ICE, and nCRISPResso2. The frequency of each type of indel was also comparable among the three methods, with nCRISPResso2 and ICE aligning the closest. nCRISPResso2 offers a viable alternative for CRISPR-Cas gRNA indel screening, especially with large amplicons unsuitable for Illumina sequencing. CRISPResso2's compatibility with Nanopore data enables cost-effective and efficient indel profiling, yielding results comparable to common Sanger sequencing-based methods.