Multimodal optical imaging of the oculofacial region using a solid tissue-simulating facial phantom

使用模拟实体组织的面部模型对眼面部进行多模态光学成像

阅读:6
作者:Lilangi S Ediriwickrema, Shijun Sung, Kaylyn C Mattick, Miranda B An, Claire Malley, Stephanie D Kirk, Divya Devineni, Jaylen M Lee, Gordon T Kennedy, Bernard Choi, Anthony J Durkin

Aim

We characterize the geometric impact of the periocular region on SFDI imaging reliability. Approach: SFDI was employed to measure the reduced scattering coefficient ( μs′μs'<math> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <mrow><mo>'</mo></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> ) and absorption coefficient ( μaμa<math> <mrow><msub><mi>μ</mi> <mi>a</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> ) of the periocular region in a cast facial tissue-simulating phantom by capturing images along regions of interest (ROIs): inferior temporal quadrant (ITQ), inferior nasal quadrant (INQ), superior temporal quadrant (STQ), central eyelid margin (CEM), rostral lateral nasal bridge (RLNB), and forehead (FH). The phantom was placed on a chin rest and imaged nine times from an "en face" or "side profile" position, and the flat back of the phantom was measured 15 times.

Conclusions

We are the first to evaluate the geometric implications of wide-field imaging along the periocular region using a solid tissue-simulating facial phantom. Results suggest that the ITQ, INQ, STQ, and FH of a generalized face have minimal impact on the SFDI measurement accuracy. Areas with heightened topographic variation exhibit measurement variability. Device and facial positioning do not appear to bias measurements. These findings confirm the need to carefully select ROIs when measuring optical properties along the periocular region.

Results

The measured μaμa<math> <mrow><msub><mi>μ</mi> <mi>a</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> and μs′μs'<math> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <mrow><mo>'</mo></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> of a cast facial phantom are accurate when comparing the ITQ, INQ, STQ, and FH to its flat posterior surface. Paired tt<math><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow> </math> tests of ITQ, INQ, STQ, and FH μaμa<math> <mrow><msub><mi>μ</mi> <mi>a</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> and μs′μs'<math> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <mrow><mo>'</mo></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> concluded that there is not enough evidence to suggest that imaging orientation impacted the measurement accuracy. Regions of extreme topographical variation, i.e., CEM and RLNB, did exhibit differences in measured optical properties. Conclusions: We are the first to evaluate the geometric implications of wide-field imaging along the periocular region using a solid tissue-simulating facial phantom. Results suggest that the ITQ, INQ, STQ, and FH of a generalized face have minimal impact on the SFDI measurement accuracy. Areas with heightened topographic variation exhibit measurement variability. Device and facial positioning do not appear to bias measurements. These findings confirm the need to carefully select ROIs when measuring optical properties along the periocular region.

Significance

Spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) applies patterned near-infrared illumination to quantify the optical properties of subsurface tissue. The periocular region is unique due to its complex ocular adnexal anatomy. Although SFDI has been successfully applied to relatively flat in vivo tissues, regions that have significant height variations and curvature may result in optical property inaccuracies. Aim: We characterize the geometric impact of the periocular region on SFDI imaging reliability. Approach: SFDI was employed to measure the reduced scattering coefficient ( μs′μs'<math> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <mrow><mo>'</mo></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> ) and absorption coefficient ( μaμa<math> <mrow><msub><mi>μ</mi> <mi>a</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> ) of the periocular region in a cast facial tissue-simulating phantom by capturing images along regions of interest (ROIs): inferior temporal quadrant (ITQ), inferior nasal quadrant (INQ), superior temporal quadrant (STQ), central eyelid margin (CEM), rostral lateral nasal bridge (RLNB), and forehead (FH). The phantom was placed on a chin rest and imaged nine times from an "en face" or "side profile" position, and the flat back of the phantom was measured 15 times. Results: The measured μaμa<math> <mrow><msub><mi>μ</mi> <mi>a</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> and μs′μs'<math> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <mrow><mo>'</mo></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> of a cast facial phantom are accurate when comparing the ITQ, INQ, STQ, and FH to its flat posterior surface. Paired tt<math><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow> </math> tests of ITQ, INQ, STQ, and FH μaμa<math> <mrow><msub><mi>μ</mi> <mi>a</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> and μs′μs'<math> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <mrow><mo>'</mo></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> concluded that there is not enough evidence to suggest that imaging orientation impacted the measurement accuracy. Regions of extreme topographical variation, i.e., CEM and RLNB, did exhibit differences in measured optical properties. Conclusions: We are the first to evaluate the geometric implications of wide-field imaging along the periocular region using a solid tissue-simulating facial phantom. Results suggest that the ITQ, INQ, STQ, and FH of a generalized face have minimal impact on the SFDI measurement accuracy. Areas with heightened topographic variation exhibit measurement variability. Device and facial positioning do not appear to bias measurements. These findings confirm the need to carefully select ROIs when measuring optical properties along the periocular region.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。