Comparative efficacy of urea, bleomycin, and polidocanol for infantile hemangioma: a retrospective cohort study with ultrasound correlation ultrasound characteristics of infantile hemangioma

尿素、博来霉素和聚多卡醇治疗婴幼儿血管瘤的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究及超声相关性分析;婴幼儿血管瘤的超声特征

阅读:2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of urea, bleomycin, and polidocanol in treating infantile hemangiomas (IHs) and evaluate correlations between ultrasound features and treatment outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 234 IHs cases treated with urea (Group A), bleomycin (Group B), or polidocanol (Group C) between January 2020 and January 2025. Infants aged 0-3 years received two sclerotherapy courses spaced 4 months apart. Outcomes were assessed via clinical measurements, ultrasound evaluations (blood flow grade, vascular proliferation), and physician assessments. Safety and adverse events were also monitored. RESULTS: Bleomycin demonstrated superior efficacy, with a 40% complete response (CR) rate at 6 months and no non-responsive cases. Urea showed gradual improvement over time (33% CR at 6 months), while polidocanol had variable efficacy (25% CR at 6 months). Reduction in ultrasound-measured blood flow grade strongly correlated with better outcomes (p < 0.05), but vascular proliferation changes (mesh-like texture) showed no clear association. No significant adverse events were reported during the study period. CONCLUSION: Bleomycin is the most effective and stable sclerotherapy for IHs, particularly for rapid response. Urea may suit long-term management, while polidocanol requires cautious use. The reduction in blood flow grade, as assessed by ultrasound, is a significant predictor of better therapeutic outcomes. These findings suggest that monitoring blood flow grade through ultrasound could serve as a valuable tool for clinicians to evaluate the efficacy of sclerotherapy in real-time. As a retrospective study, these findings should be interpreted with consideration of potential selection bias. Further prospective studies are needed to validate results and optimize protocols. The study design is retrospective, which introduces potential biases such as selection bias and confounding variables. The conclusions drawn from this study should be interpreted with caution due to these limitations. Future research should include prospective, randomized controlled trials to validate the findings and minimize biases.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。