Blood and urine biomarkers for the diagnosis of early stages of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review

血液和尿液生物标志物在膝骨关节炎早期诊断中的应用:系统评价

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify biomarkers in human blood or urine at an early stage of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to elucidate if any can accurately differentiate between healthy controls and early knee OA patients and be considered as a candidate for widespread clinical use for early diagnosis of the disease. METHODS: Medline, Embase and Web of Science were screened to identify comparative studies measuring differences in blood or urine biomarkers between healthy controls and knee OA patients at an early stage (grade 1 or 2 Kellgren-Laurence). Two independent reviewers screened the abstracts for eligibility, reviewed the full texts, assessed the methodological quality and extracted the data. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for diagnostic test accuracy studies was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Due to relevant heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not appropriate. RESULTS: Five studies met the eligibility criteria. The examined biomarkers were adropin, collagen type II metabolite, C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type II collagen, C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, matrix metalloproteinase 3, N-terminal propeptide of procollagen type IIA, type I procollagen N-terminal propeptides, N-terminal osteocalcin, angiopoietin-2, follistatin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, hepatocyte growth factor, interleukin-8, leptin, platelet-derived growth factor-BB, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, vascular endothelial growth factor and calprotectin and totalling 19 biomarkers. All of the biomarkers were studied only once in the selected papers. CONCLUSIONS: There is no reliable biomarker available to differentiate between early knee OA in patients and healthy controls, but a potential role of a cluster of biomarkers to close this gap. There are several limitations, including inappropriate study designs, small sample sizes, nonconsecutive patient groups and inadequate statistical methods for evaluating biomarker performance in studies included. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。