Diversity and composition of gut microbiome of cervical cancer patients: Do results of 16S rRNA sequencing and whole genome sequencing approaches align?

宫颈癌患者肠道微生物组的多样性和组成:16S rRNA 测序和全基因组测序方法的结果是否一致?

阅读:9
作者:Greyson Biegert, Molly B El Alam, Tatiana Karpinets, Xiaogang Wu, Travis T Sims, Kyoko Yoshida-Court, Erica J Lynn, Jingyan Yue, Andrea Delgado Medrano, Joseph Petrosino, Melissa P Mezzari, Nadim J Ajami, Travis Solley, Mustapha Ahmed-Kaddar, Ann H Klopp, Lauren E Colbert

Background

Next generation sequencing has progressed rapidly, characterizing microbial communities beyond culture-based or biochemical techniques. 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (16S) produces reliable taxonomic classifications and relative abundances, while shotgun metagenome sequencing (WMS) allows higher taxonomic and functional resolution at greater cost. The

Conclusion

Diversity, evenness and richness are comparable when using 16S and WMS techniques, however relative abundances of individual genera are not. Clinical associations with diversity and evenness metrics were similarly identified with WMS or 16S.

Results

Comparative indices were highly congruent between 16S and WMS. The most abundant genera for 16S and WMS data did not overlap. Overlap was observed at the Phylum level, as expected. However, relative abundances correlated poorly between the two methodologies (all P-value>0.05). Hierarchical clustering of both sequencing analyses identified overlapping enterotypes. Both approaches were in agreement with regard to demographic variables.

特别声明

1、本文转载旨在传播信息,不代表本网站观点,亦不对其内容的真实性承担责任。

2、其他媒体、网站或个人若从本网站转载使用,必须保留本网站注明的“来源”,并自行承担包括版权在内的相关法律责任。

3、如作者不希望本文被转载,或需洽谈转载稿费等事宜,请及时与本网站联系。

4、此外,如需投稿,也可通过邮箱info@biocloudy.com与我们取得联系。