Abstract
Memories that differ in content or duration differ in the extent to which they depend on the hippocampus, and also the part of the hippocampus, posterior (pHPC) or anterior (aHPC), that they implicate. Inter-individual differences in learning-related activation in different hippocampal subregions have been found to predict specific differences in memory abilities. The complexity of these relationships creates a setting that is ripe for theoretically informative investigation, but that can also lead to reports of spurious relationships that do not reflect underlying neurobiological associations. Across-study replication is therefore a critical first step toward understanding how differences in hippocampal activity drive individual differences in memory ability. In the domain of verbal memory, Wig et al. (2008) identified a negative relationship between task-induced activation in pHPC and out-of-scanner verbal memory test performance. Replicating this result in an independent sample of 86 participants, we identified the same negative correlation between pHPC activation during a Lithuanian word learning task and out-of-scanner California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) performance. This replication represents a critical step toward understanding how pHPC supports verbal memory by answering the basic question of whether the relationship can be reliably observed.