Comparative outcomes of supraspinatus tendon reconstruction and superior capsule reconstruction for massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears

冈上肌腱重建术与肩关节上囊重建术治疗巨大不可修复性后上肩袖撕裂的疗效比较

阅读:1

Abstract

Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) is established for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (IMRCTs). Supraspinatus tendon reconstruction (STR), a novel technique restoring muscle anatomy, lacks comparative studies with SCR. To compare STR and SCR efficacy in shoulder function, ROM, and radiological outcomes for posterosuperior IMRCTs. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 59 patients (SCR: n = 16; STR: n = 43) treated between December 2019 and November 2023. Outcomes included isokinetic muscle strength, active ROM (forward flexion [FF], abduction [ABD], external rotation [ER], internal rotation [IR]), patient-reported scores (VAS, ASES, Constant, UCLA), and radiological measures (acromiohumeral distance [AHD], Sugaya score, Goutallier classification). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in ROM, shoulder scores, and AHD postoperatively (P < 0.05). STR required shorter operative times (197.86 ± 32.88 vs. 291.25 ± 72.69 min, P < 0.01) and showed superior reductions in supraspinatus fat infiltration (Goutallier classification: P < 0.01) and greater gains in abduction (ΔABD: P = 0.021) and forward flexion strength (ΔFF: P < 0.01) compared to SCR. No differences were observed in VAS, ASES, or UCLA scores between groups (P > 0.05). Both techniques similarly improve shoulder function. STR demonstrates advantages in operative efficiency, muscle recovery, and mitigating fat infiltration, suggesting potential preference for posterosuperior IMRCTs.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。