The regulation of fatty acid mobilization is extravagant rather than frugal: a perspective indicating a limitation of the thrifty genotype hypothesis

脂肪酸动员的调控方式是奢侈而非节俭:这一观点表明节俭基因型假说存在局限性。

阅读:1

Abstract

It has been previously proposed that humans are prone to type 2 diabetes because of thrifty genes. It was suggested that the evolution of humans following their split from other primate lineages was uniquely afflicted with cycles of feast and famine, leading to a strong drive to acquire and sequester energy to prepare for future bouts of negative energy balance. In this previous theory, the thrifty genotype hypothesis, it was postulated that this thriftiness led to obesity and type 2 diabetes. The concept of thriftiness may apply to some but not all aspects of metabolism. Here, a major exception to the concept of thriftiness is proposed, noting that in lipid metabolism, there is typically an excess of energy mobilization rather than a conservative or cautious regulation of free fatty acid (FFA) mobilization. On the basis of review and interpretation of literature, it is proposed in this perspective article that a fundamental reason for obesity-related comorbidities is that the body is not sufficiently thrifty in its fat metabolism. Rather than regulation of fatty acid mobilization being frugal, it is instead quite extravagant, with excessive FFA release from adipose tissue being a common occurrence in humans and other animals. Experimental evidence suggests that a rising plasma FFA level worsens insulin resistance, and conversely, making FFA mobilization thriftier (slowing FFA mobilization) improves insulin sensitivity. It is concluded that fatty acid trafficking is inherently unthrifty and that this lavish approach for regulating fat metabolism contributes to the high incidence of pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。