Abstract
Spurred by the enormous therapeutic success of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists (GLP1-RAs) against diabetes and obesity, glucagon family receptor pharmacology has garnered a tremendous amount of interest. Glucagon family receptors, e.g., the glucagon receptor itself (GCGR), the GLP-1R, and the glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide receptor (GIPR), belong to the incretin receptor superfamily, i.e., receptors that increase blood glucose-dependent insulin secretion. All incretin receptors are class B1 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), coupling to the G(s) type of heterotrimeric G proteins which activates adenylyl cyclase (AC) to produce cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Most GPCRs undergo desensitization, i.e., uncouple from G proteins and internalize, thanks to interactions with the βarrestins (arrestin-2 and -3). Since the βarrestins can also mediate their own G protein-independent signaling, any given GPCR can theoretically signal (predominantly) either via G proteins or βarrestins, i.e., be a G protein- or βarrestin-"biased" receptor, depending on the bound ligand. A plethora of experimental evidence suggests that the GLP-1R does not undergo desensitization in physiologically relevant tissues in vivo, but rather, it produces robust and prolonged cAMP signals. A particular property of constant cycling between the cell membrane and caveolae/lipid rafts of the GLP-1R may underlie its lack of desensitization. In contrast, GIPR signaling is extensively mediated by βarrestins and the GIPR undergoes significant desensitization, internalization, and downregulation, which may explain why both agonists and antagonists of the GIPR exert the same physiological effects. Here, we discuss this evidence and make a case for the GLP-1R being a phenotypically or functionally G(s)-selective receptor. We also discuss the implications of this for the development of GLP-1R poly-ligands, which are increasingly pursued for the treatment of obesity and other diseases.