Textual quantitative research and implications of China's medical education policies-analysis based on the "tool-development-intensity" three-dimensional framework

基于“工具-发展-强度”三维框架的中国医学教育政策文本定量研究及其启示分析

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze China's "medical education" policies issued in the past three decades using the "tool-development-intensity" framework, explore the focus and deficiencies of policy texts, and propose recommendations. METHODS: Based on content analysis and quantitative analysis, construct the three-dimensional framework of "tool-development-intensity," classify and conduct cross-comparative analysis on national-level medical education policy provisions. RESULTS: Environmental policy instruments dominate medical education policies (57.76%, intensity 0.585), primarily comprising "coordination mechanisms" (intensity 0.248) and "enhanced safeguards" (intensity 0.181), reflecting the government's governance approach centered on top-level design and institutional safeguards. Supply-oriented (20.69%, intensity 0.200) and demand-oriented tools (21.55%, intensity 0.215) are notably underutilized. Across medical education dimensions, "guarantee mechanisms" exhibit the highest policy intensity (0.312), followed by "training models" (0.228), while "schooling formats" receive the least attention (0.136). Three-dimensional cross-analysis reveals structural imbalances in policy tools across different developmental dimensions, such as the "guarantee mechanism" heavily relying on environmental tools. CONCLUSION: China's medical education policies exhibit a characteristic "environment-dominated, safeguarding-priority" pattern, reflecting strong state mobilization and institutional regulation. However, significant shortcomings remain in stimulating grassroots innovation, promoting diversified institutional models, and supporting international research collaboration. Future efforts should optimize the policy tool structure, increase investment in supply-demand policies for critical weak links, and advance the coordinated, high-quality development of the medical education system.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。