Abstract
BACKGROUND: Student-led clinics (SLC) have been described, but not in gynecology. Gynecology is a subject typically covered in the last terms of medical training, however it includes few opportunities for students to tackle all phases of a consultation and a shortage of opportunities to perform gynecological examinations. Therefore, we started a student-led clinic for cervical cancer screening (SLC-CCS) in Linköping, Sweden and aimed to evaluate students' views on the progression of learning, the quality of the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, and women´s experiences of the visit, using mixed methodology. METHODS: The implementation of the SLC-CCS is described in detail. Students (n = 61) taking part in the SLC-CCS between January and May 2021 were invited to participate in a follow-up discussion (n = 24) focused around four themes: attitudes and expectations prior to participation, experiences of the patient encounter, organization of the placement, and reflections on and suggestions for further development of the placements. The group meetings were conducted in Swedish, recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to a qualitative, descriptive thematic analysis. Thematic analysis is considered an appropriate method of analysis for seeking to understand experiences, thoughts, or behaviors across a data set. The proportion of Pap smears lacking cells from the squamous epithelium during the study period was compared with data from the same clinic before the SLC-CCS started. A validated questionnaire on women's experience of the Pap smear visit was provided. Answers were compared between women who had the Pap smear taken by a student or a healthcare provider. RESULTS: Three different themes were generated: growing confidence in the clinical situation, embodied awareness of variation in anatomy, doubting accuracy of one's own performance. The percentage of Pap smears lacking cells from the squamous epithelium were equal (2%) during the study period compared to the period before the SLC-CCS started (p = 0.28). No difference was found in the satisfaction index between the women examined by a student, those examined by a healthcare provider, or women who did not know who the examiner was (p = 0.112). CONCLUSIONS: The students expressed a growing confidence in the clinical situation and there was high satisfaction from the women. The quality of the Pap smears taken by the students was equal to the quality of those taken by the health care staff. All these findings indicate that high patient safety was maintained during this activity support the recommendation to include SLC-CCS as part of the medical training.