Abstract
Background/Objectives: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major cause of cardiovascular mortality, particularly in high-risk cases complicated by hemodynamic instability. Systemic thrombolysis is the recommended treatment in such settings; however, the coexistence of thrombocytopenia represents a major therapeutic challenge due to concerns regarding bleeding risk. Evidence guiding thrombolytic therapy in thrombocytopenic patients with PE is limited. This study aimed to present a representative case and review the available literature addressing thrombolysis in PE complicated by thrombocytopenia. Methods: A qualitative review of published case reports was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases, and articles describing adult patients with objectively confirmed PE, documented thrombocytopenia, and treatment with thrombolytic therapy were included. Eight case reports met the inclusion criteria, and the clinical characteristics, severity markers, platelet dynamics, treatment strategies and outcomes were analyzed and compared with the reported case. Results: Most of the reported patients presented with high-risk pulmonary embolism, defined by hemodynamic instability, including shock or cardiac arrest. Thrombolysis was frequently administered despite platelet counts below conventional thresholds. Platelet levels at the time of thrombolysis varied widely, including cases of severe thrombocytopenia. Clinical and hemodynamic improvement was observed in most of the cases, while major bleeding complications were infrequent. The reported case demonstrated successful systemic thrombolysis with rt-PA in a postpartum patient with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and high-risk PE, without hemorrhagic events. Conclusions: Available evidence suggests that thrombolytic therapy may be a viable life-saving option in carefully selected thrombocytopenic patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism. Therapeutic decisions should prioritize clinical severity and hemodynamic status over platelet count alone, emphasizing individualized, multidisciplinary risk-benefit assessment.