Thermal Response-Based Evaluation of Non-Ablative Fractional Er:Glass Laser Therapy for Scar Management: A Retrospective Observational Study with Forward-Looking Infrared (FLIR) Monitoring

基于热响应的非剥脱性点阵铒玻璃激光治疗瘢痕的评估:一项采用前视红外(FLIR)监测的回顾性观察研究

阅读:3

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Non-ablative fractional lasers are widely used for scar remodeling, yet treatment parameters are often selected empirically, and thermal thresholds for consistent outcomes remain undefined. This study explored whether forward-looking infrared (FLIR) thermography can estimate laser-induced surface temperature changes during 1550 nm Er:Glass laser therapy and examined the association between post-treatment temperature elevation and early clinical improvement. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated with fractional Er:Glass laser for post-surgical or traumatic scars. Skin temperature was recorded using FLIR C5 imaging at baseline (T(0)), after topical anesthesia (T(1)), and immediately post-treatment (T(2)). The temperature change (ΔT(2)) was calculated as T(2) - T(0). Clinical outcomes were assessed one month after treatment using standardized digital photographs and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores. Safety data were collected from post-procedure observations and patient reports. Results: Mean surface temperature increased from 32.4 ± 0.9 °C at T(0) to 33.7 ± 0.7 °C at T(2) (ΔT(2) = +1.3 ± 0.6 °C, p < 0.001). Hypertrophic scars showed higher ΔT(2) values than linear scars (p = 0.02). A moderate temperature elevation was modestly associated with early VSS improvement (r = 0.42, p = 0.003). Representative cases with ΔT(2) values around 1.5-2.5 °C exhibited favorable short-term changes in texture and pigmentation. No adverse events were observed during follow-up. Conclusions: Real-time FLIR thermography may provide a non-invasive method to indirectly assess surface thermal response during non-ablative fractional treatment. A moderate temperature increase may be associated with an exploratory thermal response range linked to early clinical improvement, but the findings are preliminary. Further prospective, controlled studies with standardized treatment parameters and longer follow-up are required to clarify whether ΔT(2) has clinical relevance as a physiologic parameter for temperature-based assessment in scar management.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。