Abstract
Background: Preventing postoperative infections in hand surgery is an important factor for achieving sustainable results of surgical procedures. To prevent infections, especially when implants are used, preoperative prophylactic antibiotics are applied in adherence to predominantly national guidelines, which are not specifically tailored to hand surgery. However, several studies related to elective soft tissue hand surgery indicate that the preoperative use of antibiotics does not reduce the incidence of postoperative infections. Evidence regarding their efficacy in osteosynthesis of the hand and wrist remains limited. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed 542 adult patients who underwent hand or wrist osteosynthesis between 2016 and 2019 at our university center. They were enrolled in an antibiotic treatment group and a control group without antibiotic treatment. The prophylaxis group (P) underwent surgery in the main operating theater under intravenous anesthesia, whereas the non-prophylaxis group (NP) was treated under WALANT (Wide Awake Local Anesthetic No Tourniquet) in an outpatient operating theater without receiving preoperative antibiotics. Theater construction and installation were otherwise similar, and both were classified as grade 1 theaters. We applied propensity modeling and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to achieve balanced treatment groups with respect to risk factors for infection, and we calculated the odds ratio of prophylaxis and infection. Inclusion factors for risk of infection were age, female sex, smoking, diabetes, metabolic disease, inflammatory disease, substance abuse, cardiovascular disease, hepatopathy, renal disease, polytrauma, open fracture, being a manual worker, and occupational accidents. To assess the severity of the cases, we considered whether the fractures were intraarticular, multi-fragmentary, or open, and we collected data on the types of surgical implants that were used. Results: No significant association was found between antibiotic prophylaxis and postoperative infection rate (infection rate P: 3.86%; NP: 3.27%; unadjusted OR: 1.19; adjusted OR after IPTW: 1.09). In terms of risk factors, there was an insignificant trend of higher infection rates in the subgroups smoking, cardiovascular disease, open fracture, occupational accident, and open fixations. Conclusions: In this cohort, routine use of preoperative antibiotics in hand osteosynthesis did not reduce infection rates. The effectiveness of the widespread standardized application of prophylactic antibiotics to reduce the risk of postoperative infections in osteosynthesis of the hand and wrist remains debatable. Our findings set the basis for further prospective studies aiming at clearer guidelines for evidence-based perioperative patient care.