Diagnostic and Prognostic Evaluation of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Using the Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Index

利用弥散性血管内凝血指数对弥散性血管内凝血进行诊断和预后评估

阅读:1

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) have been established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (JMHLW), the International Society of Thrombosis Hemostasis (ISTH), and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM). These criteria vary and are complicated, and the cutoff values differ, so a simple and rapid diagnostic approach for DIC is needed. Materials and Methods: The usefulness of the DIC index (prothrombin time-international normalized ratio [PT-INR] x D-dimer/platelet count) for diagnosing DIC and predicting outcomes in 1500 critically ill patients was assessed. Results: The PT-INR, D-dimer level, and DIC index were significantly higher in patients with DIC than in those without DIC, and their platelet count was significantly lower. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed that the diagnostic agreement was the highest for the JMHLW score among the three diagnostic criteria. The PT-INR, D-dimer level, DIC index, and JMHLW, ISTH overt-DIC, and modified JAAM DIC scores were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors, and their platelet counts were significantly lower. Although ROC analyses showed that the PT-INR, D-dimer level, platelet count, DIC index, JMHLW, ISTH overt-DIC, and modified JAAM DIC scores were related to the outcome, the cutoff values of the DIC index, and JMHLW, ISTH overt-DIC and modified JAAM DIC scores were low. Conclusions: The DIC index was highly consistent with the three diagnostic criteria for DIC and related outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。