Abstract
Background: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) injections and arthrocentesis are commonly used minimally invasive methods for treating temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Although considered safe, they can cause neurological complications. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize all identified evidence for neurological adverse events following intra-articular TMJ interventions. Methods: This review was based on a systematic search with BASE, DOAJ, PubMed, SciELO, and Semantic Scholar on 28 May 2025. It included primary studies involving patients diagnosed with TMDs who underwent intra-articular injections into the TMJ or were treated with arthrocentesis, and in whom neurological adverse effects associated with the intra-articular intervention were reported. Studies reporting non-specific symptoms or unrelated systemic conditions were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools. Results were presented in summary tables. Results: The search yielded five eligible studies comprising 319 patients, of whom 320 neurological adverse events were reported. Included studies comprised a randomized controlled trial, two retrospective studies, and two case reports. Four studies had a low risk of bias, and one had a moderate risk of bias according to the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools. The proportion of patients affected ranged from 14% to 65% depending on the study design and intervention type. The most common adverse event was transient facial nerve (cranial nerve VII) paralysis, mainly involving the temporal and zygomatic branches. Less commonly reported complications involved the trigeminal nerve branches (V1, V3). There is also a single case of epidural hematoma with palsy of the oculomotor nerve (III). Most symptoms resolved spontaneously within a few hours to a few days. The use of local anesthesia and large volumes of irrigation (60 mL) during arthrocentesis increases the risk of complications. Attempts to explain the mechanisms of complications include local anesthetic diffusion, compression neuropraxia due to lavage fluid leakage, and corticosteroid neurotoxicity. One of the limitations of the study is the scarcity of data. Conclusions: Although most adverse events are mild and reversible, these findings highlight that precise, real-time guided injection and careful control of lavage volumes can minimize extra-articular spread of anesthetics or fluids, thereby reducing the likelihood of neurological complications. This study received no funding. PROSPERO ID number: CRD420251088170.