Abstract
Tooth wear is a growing oral health concern with implications for function, esthetics, and psychological well-being, ultimately affecting oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). While clinical indices assess tooth wear severity, they fail to capture patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This narrative review aims to identify and synthesize the use of PROs and PROMs used in adults with tooth wear and to map their assessed domains against the Wilson and Cleary model of health outcomes, highlighting gaps and guiding the development of condition-specific instruments. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase. Studies involving PROMs in adults with tooth wear were included. Extracted data encompassed psychometric properties and domains assessed. PROMs such as the OHIP, OES, OIDP, and QMFQ have been frequently used, focusing on functional limitation, esthetic perception, and psychological distress. However, no single instrument comprehensively addresses all relevant domains of the Wilson and Cleary model. Moreover, variation in tools and constructs limits comparability across studies and clinical settings. Existing PROMs capture only partial aspects of the patient experience related to tooth wear. When mapping these instruments to a validated theoretical model, significant gaps become evident, especially in terms of general health perceptions and overall quality of life metrics. To improve the evaluation and management of tooth wear in clinical settings, it is essential to create a condition-specific PROM based on a solid conceptual framework.