Abstract
Developmental plasticity enables the production of alternative phenotypes in response to different environmental conditions. While significant advances in understanding the ecological and evolutionary implications of plasticity have been made, understanding its genetic basis has lagged. However, a decade of genetic screens in the model nematode Pristionchus pacificus has culminated in 30 genes which affect mouth-form plasticity. We also recently reported the critical window of environmental sensitivity, and therefore have clear expectations for when differential gene expression should matter. Here, we collated previous data into a gene-regulatory network (GRN), and performed developmental transcriptomics across different environmental conditions, genetic backgrounds, and mouth-form mutants to assess the regulatory logic of plasticity. We found that only two genes in the GRN (eud-1 and seud-1/sult-1) are sensitive to the environment during the critical window. Interestingly, the time points of their sensitivity differ, suggesting that they act as sequential checkpoints. We also observed temporal constraint upon the transcriptional effects of mutating the GRN and revealed unexpected feedback between mouth-form genes. Surprisingly, expression of seud-1/sult-1, but not eud-1, correlated with mouth form biases across different strains and species. Finally, a comprehensive analysis of all samples identified metabolism as a shared pathway for regulating mouth-form plasticity. These data are presented in a Shiny app to facilitate gene-expression comparisons across development in up to 14 different conditions. Collectively, our results suggest that mouth-form plasticity evolved a constrained, two-tiered logic to integrate environmental information leading up to the final developmental decision.