Mental health facility ownership and smoking cessation services: a facility-level analysis across the United States

美国精神卫生机构所有权与戒烟服务:一项基于机构层面的分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the U.S., tobacco use affects 19.8% of adults (49.2 million) as of 2022, with rates highest among those with mental health conditions. Mental health facilities offering cessation counseling present critical opportunities to support these vulnerable populations. This study aims to examine how ownership structure influences smoking cessation counseling provision in U.S. outpatient mental health facilities. METHOD: This cross-sectional study derived data on 9,645 outpatient (OPD) mental facilities from the 2019 N-MHSS-a census of all public and private mental health treatment facilities in the United States. We used multiple logistic regressions to examine how facility ownership would be associated with smoking cessation counseling provision, controlling for other facility characteristics. Models adjusted for state-level clustering for correlated random variances in service provisions across facilities in the same state. RESULT: Of the outpatient facilities surveyed, 41.72% of OPD provided smoking cessation counseling. Compared to public facilities, private for-profit facilities were 30% less likely to provide smoking cessation counseling [odds ratio (OR) = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.59-0.82; p < 0.05]. Private non-profit facilities were 27% less likely to provide smoking cessation counseling (OR = 0.73, CI = 0.64-0.83; p < 0.05), while controlling for other confounders. CONCLUSION: Publicly-owned facilities demonstrate higher rates of smoking cessation counseling provision compared to both private non-profit and for-profit counterparts. This disparity in service availability raises concerns for tobacco control efforts, particularly as privatization in mental healthcare continues to expand. The observed pattern suggests potential misalignment between public health priorities and service delivery in private settings. Future policy initiatives should address these gaps and investigate underlying factors driving ownership-based differences in cessation services for patients with mental illness.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。