Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer Patients with [(18)F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT Compared with [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT

前列腺癌患者初次分期中[(18)F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT 与 [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT 的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hybrid imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is gaining importance as an increasingly meaningful tool for prostate cancer (PC) diagnostics and as a guide for therapy decisions. This study aims to investigate and compare the performance of [(18)F]PSMA-1007 ((18)F-PSMA) and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((68)Ga-PSMA) in the initial staging of PC patients. METHODS: The data of 88 biopsy-proven patients were retrospectively evaluated. PSMA-avid lesions were compared with the histopathologic Gleason Score (GS) for prostate biopsies, and the results were plotted by receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-curve. Optimal maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) cut-off values were rated using the Youden index. RESULTS: (18)F-PSMA was able to distinguish GS ≤ 7a from ≥7b with a sensitivity of 62%, specificity of 85%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 92%, and accuracy of 67% for a SUV(max) of 8.95, whereas sensitivity was 54%, specificity 91%, PPV 93%, and accuracy 66% for (68)Ga-PSMA (SUV(max) 8.7). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods demonstrated a high concordance of detected PSMA-avid lesions with histopathologically proven PC. (18)F-PSMA and (68)Ga-PSMA are both suitable for the characterization of primary PC with a comparable correlation of PSMA-avid lesions with GS. Neither method showed a superior advantage. Our calculated SUV(max) thresholds may represent valuable parameters in clinical use to distinguish clinically significant PC (csPC) from non-csPC.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。