Loss of SMAD4 Is Sufficient to Promote Tumorigenesis in a Model of Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) develops from its precursor Barrett's esophagus through intermediate stages of low- and high-grade dysplasia. However, knowledge of genetic drivers and molecular mechanisms implicated in disease progression is limited. Herein, we investigated the effect of Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (SMAD4) loss on transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signaling functionality and in vivo tumorigenicity in high-grade dysplastic Barrett's cells.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) develops from its precursor Barrett's esophagus through intermediate stages of low- and high-grade dysplasia. However, knowledge of genetic drivers and molecular mechanisms implicated in disease progression is limited. Herein, we investigated the effect of Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (SMAD4) loss on transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signaling functionality and in vivo tumorigenicity in high-grade dysplastic Barrett's cells.

Altogether, up-regulation of oncogenes, down-regulation of tumor-suppressor genes, and chromosomal instability within the tumors after SMAD4 loss implicates SMAD4 as a protector of genome integrity in EAC development and progression. Foremost, SMAD4 loss promotes tumorigenesis from dysplastic Barrett's toward EAC.

An in vivo xenograft model was used to test tumorigenicity of SMAD4 knockdown or knockout in CP-B high-grade dysplastic Barrett's cells. RT2 polymerase chain reaction arrays were used to analyze TGF-β signaling functionality, and low-coverage whole-genome sequencing was performed to detect copy number alterations upon SMAD4 loss.

We found that SMAD4 knockout significantly alters the TGF-β pathway target gene expression profile. SMAD4 knockout positively regulates potential oncogenes such as CRYAB, ACTA2, and CDC6, whereas the CDKN2A/B tumor-suppressor locus was regulated negatively. We verified that SMAD4 in combination with CDC6-CDKN2A/B or CRYAB genetic alterations in patient tumors have significant predictive value for poor prognosis. Importantly, we investigated the effect of SMAD4 inactivation in Barrett's tumorigenesis. We found that genetic knockdown or knockout of SMAD4 was sufficient to promote tumorigenesis in dysplastic Barrett's esophagus cells in vivo. Progression to invasive EAC was accompanied by distinctive and consistent copy number alterations in SMAD4 knockdown or knockout xenografts. Conclusions: Altogether, up-regulation of oncogenes, down-regulation of tumor-suppressor genes, and chromosomal instability within the tumors after SMAD4 loss implicates SMAD4 as a protector of genome integrity in EAC development and progression. Foremost, SMAD4 loss promotes tumorigenesis from dysplastic Barrett's toward EAC.