Effectiveness and safety of single anti-seizure medication as adjunctive therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy based on network meta-analysis

基于网络荟萃分析的单一抗癫痫药物作为药物难治性局灶性癫痫辅助治疗的有效性和安全性

阅读:7

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluated the effectiveness and safety of single anti-seizure medication (ASM) when used as adjunctive therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMbase, and the Cochrane Library from their inception until 12 February, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting our criteria. The trials were analyzed for their use of ASMs in treating drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Inclusion criteria comprised: 1) Participants aged 12 years or older with drug-resistant focal epilepsy; 2) Incorporation of an additional single ASM as an adjunct to the existing antiepileptic treatment regimen; 3) Comparison with placebo or continuation of the original antiepileptic regimen without a new ASM; 4) Primary outcome as a 50% response rate, with safety as a secondary outcome, encompassing dizziness, somnolence, headache, ataxia, diplopia, fatigue, and nausea; and 5) Study design limited to RCTs. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was employed to rank the effectiveness and safety of the ASMs. RESULTS: A total of 53 RCTs involving 17 ASMs as adjunctive therapy and placebo were analyzed. Compared to placebo, the following ASMs demonstrated statistically significant effectiveness in achieving a 50% response rate: brivaracetam (RR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.53-2.81), cenobamate (RR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.56-2.88), eslicarbazepine acetate (RR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.41-2.70), gabapentin (RR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.76-3.02), lacosamide (RR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.47-3.35), lamotrigine (RR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.00-2.40), levetiracetam (RR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.88-3.15), oxcarbazepine (RR = 3.03, 95% CI: 2.08-4.40), perampanel (RR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.21-2.44), pregabalin (RR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.70-2.50), rufinamide (RR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.20-4.31), tiagabine (RR = 4.07, 95% CI: 2.03-8.18), topiramate (RR = 3.10, 95% CI: 2.44-3.95), vigabatrin (RR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.58-3.46), and zonisamide (RR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.76-3.27). Based on SUCRA rankings, tiagabine (92.7%) exhibited the most favorable therapeutic outcome, followed by topiramate (87.3%), oxcarbazepine (83%), and levetiracetam (62.8%). The ASMs with the least favorable therapeutic effects were placebo (1.1%), lamotrigine (17.8%), and perampanel (24.7%). CONCLUSION: The network meta-analysis revealed topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, and levetiracetam as the four most effective adjuvant ASM treatments for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. However, it is noteworthy that topiramate and oxcarbazepine were associated with a higher incidence of somnolence. Additionally, comprehensive safety data for tiagabine and levetiracetam are lacking, necessitating further research. Larger studies are required to solidify these findings and better understand the safety profiles of all involved ASMs.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。