Abstract
Both cirrhosis and diabetes are established risk factors for infections. However, it remains uncertain whether diabetes adds to the risk of infections in patients with cirrhosis who are already at high risk of infections, or increases the mortality following an infection. To answer these questions, we followed a cohort of trial participants with cirrhosis and ascites for 1 year to compare the incidence of infections and post-infection mortality between those with or without diabetes. METHODS: We used Cox regression to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of any infection, adjusting for confounding by patient age, gender, MELD score, albumin, use of proton pump inhibitors and lactulose, cirrhosis aetiology, and severity of ascites. Further, we analysed the mortality after infection. RESULTS: Among 1,198 patients with cirrhosis and ascites, diabetics (n = 289, 24%) were more likely than non-diabetics (n = 909, 76%) to be old and male, to have low platelets, and to use lactulose. At inclusion, similar proportions of diabetic and non-diabetic patients were taking a quinolone antibiotic (13% vs. 12%) and they had similar median MELD scores (14 vs. 15). During the follow-up, 446 patients had an infection. Diabetes did not increase the HR of infections (adjusted HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.87-1.35). Further, diabetes did not increase the mortality following an infection (adjusted HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.64-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cirrhosis and ascites, diabetes did not increase infection risk or mortality after infection. The immune incompetence of each disease did not appear to be additive. In clinical terms, this means that particular attention to infections is not indicated in patients with cirrhosis and diabetes. LAY SUMMARY: Cirrhosis and diabetes are chronic diseases that weaken the immune system and increase the risk of infections, but it is unknown whether their combined effects exceed the effect of cirrhosis alone. We showed that the risk of infections was the same in patients with cirrhosis, ascites and diabetes as in patients with cirrhosis and ascites alone. Thus, their combined effects do not exceed the effect of cirrhosis alone.